Samsung Galaxy S9


It's Galaxy S9 day! On Friday, Samsung's Galaxy S9 and larger, slightly stepped-up Galaxy S9 Plus ($800 at Amazon.com) went on sale across the globe, though some people who preordered their phones had already received them.

In the US, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint slashed prices on the full retail cost of the phone, scrambling to outdo each other for the most attractive deals. See the full list of Galaxy S9 deals here, but remember that they're only good for a limited time, and carriers often don't share what that expiration date is.
At this point, you're probably asking yourself: Is the Galaxy S9 the correct hot, new phone to buy? I've been testing both the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus for over two weeks now. And I'm 85 percent certain that these beautiful, powerful phones are two of the best that money can buy. However, the remaining 15 percent of me hangs on to the nagging disappointment that the world's largest Android brand could have done even better. Let me explain why -- and why, for some of you, my minor objections may not matter.
From a bird's-eye view, I see top-of-the-line specs combined with excellent design, internal speeds and outdoor photography. Samsung's hardware remains at the top of the market, which makes the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus excellent all-rounders that can handle the usual roster of activities and last a work day on a single charge.

These are all superb reasons to buy a Galaxy S9 if you're upgrading from an older phone such as the Galaxy S7, OnePlus 3, iPhone 6 and so on. Skip it if you have a Galaxy S8 ($540 at Amazon.com). It's too close to make the update worthwhile.
When you dive into the details, some nagging problems snap into focus that could break the experience for certain people. For example, the industry-first dual aperture lens that Samsung put in both Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus phones absolutely makes photos as bright as promised, but it also often makes them blurry if there's any movement. And the 3D avatars and new face unlock tools meant to match similar features in the iPhone X ($800 at Cricket Wireless) are either half-baked or fundamentally flawed.
While it's easy to overlook or simply avoid the Galaxy S9's weaker additions, Samsung wants these particular tools to set the Galaxy S9 apart from the competition -- and from the Galaxy S8 before it -- and they just don't live up to the claim. These fumbled details cost the Galaxy S9 CNET's rarely given Editors' Choice Award, but it's still a terrific phone in the ways that matter.
Hang tight for the results of our continuing our deep-dive testing into the S9's camera quality, battery life and durability from all angles. We're really putting both phones through their paces, and I'll soon update this review with our findings.
In the meantime, feel good about buying a Galaxy S9 or S9 Plus. For a lot of people, one of them will be the phone to get. That said, avid mobile photographers will get more richly textured low-light photography out of the Google Pixel 2 ($649 at Google Store) and 2 XL. If you crave cutting-edge security, the iPhone X has tamper-proof face unlock cornered for now, although iris unlock on the Galaxy S8 and newer is still secure. And the OnePlus 5T is a much lower-cost alternative if you're looking for a better-than-basic Android device for less.

My Instagram